
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lead, Follow, or Move &#187; VMware Infrastructure Client</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leadfollowmove.com/archives/tag/vmware-infrastructure-client/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leadfollowmove.com</link>
	<description>Adam Bell on Deployment, Automation, PowerShell et al</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:34:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>VMware VIC 2.5 and Server 2.0 Beta 1</title>
		<link>http://www.leadfollowmove.com/archives/virtualisation/vic-25-and-server-20-beta-1</link>
		<comments>http://www.leadfollowmove.com/archives/virtualisation/vic-25-and-server-20-beta-1#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Bell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Infrastructure Client]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadfollowmove.com/archives/virtualisation/vic-25-and-server-20-beta-1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been using Server 2.0 B1 for a few weeks now, and it would appear that like everyone else I really don&#8217;t like the new VI Web Access. I just find the interface very slow and hard work to use. As mentionend by Chrissy there is a VMware Infrastructure Client (2.5) that can be used [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Server 2.0 B1 for a few weeks now, and it would appear that like <a title="VMTN: VMware Server 2.0 - Use VIC 2.5" href="http://communities.vmware.com/thread/119232?tstart=0">everyone else</a> I really don&#8217;t like the new VI Web Access.</p>
<p>I just find the interface very slow and hard work to use. As mentionend by <a title="Netnerds.net: VIC to speed up Admin" href="http://blog.netnerds.net/2008/01/vmware-server-2-beta-use-virtual-infrastructure-client-to-speed-up-administration/">Chrissy</a> there is a VMware Infrastructure Client (2.5) that can be used instead of the Web UI.</p>
<p>Now ignoring the rather bizarre way required to acquire the 53mb client &#8211; which is included in the linux tarball and err, apparently not in the Windows package, I just can&#8217;t seem to get it to work &#8211; I am working in a test lab so I&#8217;m not using any AV, and I have the firewalls disabled on both of my Windows 2003 servers. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m able to connect via the Web UI, and all the other connectivity tests work fine:<br />
- I can ping both servers from each other<br />
- I can telnet from Server1 to the Host on port 8333</p>
<p>However, I always get the error message: &#8220;..could not establish the initial connection with server Server2. Details: The server took too long to respond&#8221;.</p>
<p>If anyone has any <em>constructive</em> ideas please feel free (really) to post a comment, or on my thread over on <a title="VMTN: Web UI and VIC issues" href="http://communities.vmware.com/thread/121750?tstart=0">VMTN</a>. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.leadfollowmove.com/archives/virtualisation/vic-25-and-server-20-beta-1/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
