
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lead, Follow, or Move &#187; PowerShell Support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leadfollowmove.com/archives/tag/powershell-support/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leadfollowmove.com</link>
	<description>Adam Bell on Deployment, Automation, PowerShell et al</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:34:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>S3Nas PowerShell Provider (source)</title>
		<link>http://www.leadfollowmove.com/archives/powershell/s3nas-powershell-provider-source</link>
		<comments>http://www.leadfollowmove.com/archives/powershell/s3nas-powershell-provider-source#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Bell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PowerShell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PowerShell Support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadfollowmove.com/archives/powershell/s3nas-powershell-provider-source</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was reading Scott Hanselman&#8217;s blog this morning, when I noticed a link that looked interesting: * PowerShell Drive Provider for Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) &#8211; C# Source that interfaces Amazon&#8217;s S3 to PowerShell so you can &#8220;dir&#8221; your S3 area. I haven&#8217;t looked at Amazon&#8217;s S3 Service, but if you use it, this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading <a title="Scott Hanselman's Blog" href="http://www.hanselman.com/blog/TheWeeklySourceCode1.aspx">Scott Hanselman&#8217;s</a> blog this morning, when I noticed a link that looked interesting:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.s3nas.com/Default.aspx?tabid=53&#038;EntryID=10">* PowerShell Drive Provider for Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) &#8211; C# Source that interfaces Amazon&#8217;s S3 to PowerShell so you can &#8220;dir&#8221; your S3 area. </a></p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t looked at <a title="Amazon S3" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/browse.html?node=16427261">Amazon&#8217;s S3 Service</a>, but if you use it, this may be something worth taking a look at.</p>
<p>As always it&#8217;s nice to see the adoption of PowerShell :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.leadfollowmove.com/archives/powershell/s3nas-powershell-provider-source/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PowerShell Portability</title>
		<link>http://www.leadfollowmove.com/archives/powershell/powershell-portability</link>
		<comments>http://www.leadfollowmove.com/archives/powershell/powershell-portability#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 07:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Bell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PowerShell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PowerShell Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Talk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadfollowmove.com/archives/powershell/powershell-portability</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we&#8217;ve seen there is a lot of product teams within Microsoft adopting PowerShell: Windows Server 2008 Exchange Server 2007 System Center Operations Manager 2007 System Center Data Protection Manager V2 System Center Virtual Machine Manager As people start to become aware of the power of PowerShell, we can see vendors starting looking to leverage [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we&#8217;ve seen there is a lot of product teams within Microsoft adopting PowerShell:</p>
<li>Windows Server 2008</li>
<li>Exchange Server 2007</li>
<li>System Center Operations Manager 2007</li>
<li>System Center Data Protection Manager V2</li>
<li>System Center Virtual Machine Manager</li>
<p>As people start to become aware of the power of PowerShell, we can see vendors starting looking to leverage this also:</p>
<li>F5 Networks: Support use of Windows PowerShell to manage F5&#8242;s BIG-IP network hardware.</li>
<li>Full Armor: Group-Policy Management via Windows PowerShell.</li>
<li>/n Software: Network management, messaging and ability to remotely manage Windows via Windows PowerShell.</li>
<li>PowerGadgets: Visualization product that allows users to run real-time Gadgets such as charts, gauges and maps. Uses Windows PowerShell to allow users or administrators to easily create Windows Vista Sidebar gadgets.</li>
<li>PowerGUI by Quest Software: Graphical user interface for executing Windows PowerShell commands and writing scripts. PowerShell Analyzer by Shelltools: Graphical User Interface for developers as well as administrators.</li>
<li>Quest Software: Active Directory Management including new Windows Server 2008 features including read-only domain controllers and new user configuration.
</li>
<p>Lists taken from <a title="Microsoft: PowerShell Home Page" href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/technologies/management/powershell/default.mspx">PowerShell Home page</a></p>
<p>I can see that as each product team and vendor take up this new technology they are going to create their own <a title="MSDN: Windows PowerShell Programmer's Guide" href="http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms714674.aspx">cmdlets</a> to make  administration tasks easier. Now I think this is a good thing, the adoption, creating tools to make life easier. However I see a problem that could arise from this. </p>
<p>We are going to see the PowerShell landscape changing from machine to machine depending on what products are installed. Are we going to start seeing scripts fail because they have been written with <em>cmdlet</em> dependencies?</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s the solution to this? Should <em>cmdlets</em> be deployed as addons to all PowerShell installations to keep the landscape uniform? What would be the impact on this?</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m on a non-exchange 2007 server, and I have the exchange <em>cmdlets</em> installed should they work regardless, so long as they can reach the exchange server in question?</p>
<p>Or is the solution to have our scripts smarter, and exit nicely when the cmdlet isn&#8217;t available? This still leaves us with a fractured landscape, and I can see as more products adopt PowerShell a larger difference from installation to installation. Or am I just looking at this all wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.leadfollowmove.com/archives/powershell/powershell-portability/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

